Sunday, June 17, 2012
When wearing a ring, there are a few rules that you have to abide by but I think the greatest one is to keep it safe. Wearing a tungsten wedding band makes this rule an utter impossibility. Tungsten carbide has proven countless times that it's not as sturdy as it claims and the reliability of such a ring simply doesn't work in the long term. It might seem like a question we all know the answer to but, why are diamonds far better a choice to go to than tungsten rings?
The ideal way for people to determine the hardness for any of earth's substances is the Mohs scale. Ranking from 1 to 10, all elements are placed on a chart and the hardest of minerals are ranked closer to a 10 than those that are not. Tungsten is ranked quite highly at 9 to 9.5. The uninformed might be led to believe, "oh, if this is the case, then tungsten rings have to be better than any other." Once the ring is bought, though, the rude awakening begins since, surprisingly, a higher ranking means it's far more susceptible to breaking.
The highest-ranking substance on the Mohs scale is diamond, which has a perfect 10, so it's the most susceptible to breakage. This is true but where diamond differs from tungsten carbide is in reputation. Tungsten rings would lead a person to expect that they can withstand any form of pressure, unlike diamond, and the diamond would be taken better care of. A tungsten wedding band is said to be sturdy, so it should withstand anything, in theory. This is false and there's no point in investing in tungsten over any other ring.
Personal evidence should be taken into as great consideration as the facts that bring them to life. If a woman receives a tungsten ring, the idea of being proposed to in a spectacular way is essentially lost. There's no affection to be had, either. To pour more of the figurative salt into the wound, what if the tungsten band breaks later on down the road? Things on the tungsten front appear shaky in this sense.
Tungsten might not as be easy to break as diamond but such a mineral isn't doing much else, either. Diamond is still far better to look at in comparison and it's a more common mineral to sport on any wedding band. It would make sense that a person would take better care of diamond, so there's a lesser chance of it breaking. However, for tungsten, which is supposedly sturdier, the fact that it can't withstand such pressures is utterly insulting.
The ideal way for people to determine the hardness for any of earth's substances is the Mohs scale. Ranking from 1 to 10, all elements are placed on a chart and the hardest of minerals are ranked closer to a 10 than those that are not. Tungsten is ranked quite highly at 9 to 9.5. The uninformed might be led to believe, "oh, if this is the case, then tungsten rings have to be better than any other." Once the ring is bought, though, the rude awakening begins since, surprisingly, a higher ranking means it's far more susceptible to breaking.
The highest-ranking substance on the Mohs scale is diamond, which has a perfect 10, so it's the most susceptible to breakage. This is true but where diamond differs from tungsten carbide is in reputation. Tungsten rings would lead a person to expect that they can withstand any form of pressure, unlike diamond, and the diamond would be taken better care of. A tungsten wedding band is said to be sturdy, so it should withstand anything, in theory. This is false and there's no point in investing in tungsten over any other ring.
Personal evidence should be taken into as great consideration as the facts that bring them to life. If a woman receives a tungsten ring, the idea of being proposed to in a spectacular way is essentially lost. There's no affection to be had, either. To pour more of the figurative salt into the wound, what if the tungsten band breaks later on down the road? Things on the tungsten front appear shaky in this sense.
Tungsten might not as be easy to break as diamond but such a mineral isn't doing much else, either. Diamond is still far better to look at in comparison and it's a more common mineral to sport on any wedding band. It would make sense that a person would take better care of diamond, so there's a lesser chance of it breaking. However, for tungsten, which is supposedly sturdier, the fact that it can't withstand such pressures is utterly insulting.
About the Author:
If you want additional inIf you wantmation about how simple it is to shatter tungsten carbide, simply click here today.. This article, Choosing Diamond Over Tungsten Rings is available for free reprint.